Disability digest
Trump Pushing People With Disabilities Back Into Institutions?
Disability rights advocates are warning that the latest actions by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration could undermine decades of progress toward inclusion and increase the risk of people with disabilities being placed back into institutional care
Listen to the article
The concerns stem from two recent decisions by the U.S. administration. The Department of Education has announced plans to transfer responsibility for special education to the Department of Health and Human Services, headed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice has issued a new legal interpretation that could weaken the right of people with disabilities to live in the community.
According to disability rights advocates, these decisions mark a shift away from viewing people with disabilities as equal members of society and toward the so-called medical model of disability, which primarily regards disability as a condition to be treated or corrected.
Selene Almazan, Legal Director of the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, described the moves as a direct attack on the right of people with disabilities to live lives comparable to those of people without disabilities.
Since the 1960s, the United States has gradually moved away from placing people with intellectual disabilities and mental illnesses in large institutions. A series of laws and court rulings has enabled children with disabilities to attend mainstream schools while allowing adults to live and work in their communities with appropriate support.
Particularly significant was the landmark 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C., which established that the unjustified segregation of people with disabilities constitutes discrimination. The ruling requires states to provide services in the most integrated setting appropriate, ensuring that people with disabilities have the opportunity to live, study, and work in the community whenever possible.
However, a new opinion issued by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel argues that neither the Americans with Disabilities Act nor Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act requires states to provide services in such integrated settings. Although the law itself has not changed, the new interpretation could influence how federal agencies enforce disability rights laws and encourage some states to reduce investment in community-based support services.
Additional concern has been raised by the transfer of special education responsibilities from the Department of Education to the Department of Health and Human Services. Organizations representing people with disabilities argue that education should not be treated as a medical issue but as a matter of equal opportunity and the fundamental right to education.
Criticism has also intensified because of previous statements made by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about autism. Kennedy has repeatedly made claims that contradict the scientific consensus, including suggesting a link between vaccines and autism and stating that people with autism would be unable to live independently or hold jobs.
Following widespread criticism, Kennedy clarified that he had been referring to people with the most severe forms of autism. Nevertheless, his remarks continue to fuel distrust among disability advocacy organizations.
Zoe Gross of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network emphasized that the special education system exists to help students with disabilities develop their abilities and reach their full potential. She questioned whether the new leadership would remain committed to fulfilling that mission.
Parents of children with disabilities have also voiced concern about the potential consequences. Lindsey Althaus of Ohio said that her 12-year-old son, who has autism and apraxia, attends school alongside his non-disabled peers and participates in everyday activities thanks to community-based support services. She fears that reducing states’ obligation to fund such programs could ultimately lead to their elimination.
Magda Nakassis of Maryland shared similar concerns. Her non-speaking son, who has autism, attends a public school where he takes part in inclusive educational programs alongside other students. She stressed that the right to education is not a medical issue but one of equality, dignity, and belonging.
Disability rights organizations conclude that the combination of changes to special education and the new interpretation of federal civil rights protections could pose the greatest challenge to inclusive disability policies in the United States in decades. They warn that people with disabilities could once again be pushed to the margins of society at a time when inclusion has become a widely accepted goal of modern democratic societies.
Disability digest
ENERGY POVERTY Supporting People With Disabilities
People with disabilities often have significantly greater electricity needs than other citizens across the European Union
Listen to the article
Energy poverty is affecting a growing number of households across the European Union, and recent research shows that it has a disproportionate impact on people with disabilities. The reasons for this disparity are numerous and extend well beyond financial hardship alone.
People with disabilities generally have higher electricity needs because many rely on medical equipment and assistive devices. They also tend to consume more energy for heating and cooling their homes, particularly people with physical disabilities whose health and well-being often depend on maintaining stable indoor temperatures.
To help address the growing problem of energy poverty, the European Network on Independent Living (ENIL), together with partners in the ASSERT project, has launched an online learning platform for professionals working with households affected by energy poverty.
The ASSERT platform has been developed primarily for organisations representing people with disabilities, social workers, energy advisers, healthcare professionals and other specialists who need additional knowledge and practical skills to tackle energy poverty more effectively.
In addition to professional training, the platform provides people with disabilities with practical advice and guidance on avoiding energy poverty, managing household energy costs and making more efficient use of energy systems.
More information is available on the ASSERT website at assert.aisforacademy.eu. Registration is free and open to organisations and professionals interested in strengthening the capacity of people with disabilities to respond more effectively to energy poverty.
ASSERT is a relatively new European project funded through the LIFE Programme. Over the past year and a half, it has been working to ensure that people with disabilities are not left behind in Europe’s transition to clean energy. The project currently operates in five European Union member states—Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy and Spain—and brings together experts from a wide range of fields, including disability rights and energy efficiency.
Disability digest
Sephora ‘Quiet Hours’ Make Shopping More Accessible
Global beauty retailer Sephora has introduced a ‘Quiet Hours’ programme across its stores worldwide, aiming to create a more comfortable and accessible shopping experience for neurodivergent people and anyone who prefers a calmer retail environment
Listen to the article
The initiative is the first global programme of its kind in the beauty retail sector. During designated Quiet Hours, stores will lower the volume of in-store music, adjust digital displays to reduce visual stimulation and, where possible, minimise the presence of strong fragrances. At selected locations, customers will also have access to additional options, such as mobile checkout, making the shopping experience simpler and less stressful.
The programme was developed in partnership with Open Inclusion and Purposeful Futures, with direct input from neurodivergent customers and employees whose experiences helped shape the initiative.
Before its global rollout, Sephora tested the programme in 32 stores across eight markets. The pilot project found that the majority of neurodivergent customers believed Quiet Hours significantly improved their shopping experience. In addition, 90% of all surveyed customers said the initiative made stores more inclusive and welcoming for everyone.
Experts involved in developing the programme note that people with autism, ADHD and other sensory issues often find shopping centres highly challenging environments because of loud music, bright lighting, strong fragrances and large crowds. Even relatively small adjustments, they say, can substantially reduce sensory overload and make shopping a more comfortable and independent experience.
The initiative has also received positive feedback from employees, who report that the calmer environment enables better communication with customers and reduces stress throughout the working day.
By introducing Quiet Hours, Sephora joins a growing number of major retailers offering sensory-friendly shopping periods. Similar initiatives have been adopted in recent years by supermarkets, department stores and cinemas, reflecting a broader understanding that accessibility is not only about removing physical barriers but also about creating environments where people with sensory sensitivities can feel safe, comfortable and included.
Sephora says Quiet Hours represent just one step towards creating a more inclusive shopping experience and has pledged to continue working with the neurodivergent community to develop solutions that meet the needs of an even wider range of customers.
Disability digest
Manifesto on the Rights of Young People With Disabilities
Without young people with disabilities in newsrooms, government ministries and national parliaments, the slogan “Nothing About Us Without Us” remains just that—a slogan, a decorative phrase displayed on banners at disability rights marches.
Listen to the article
Consider for yourself to what extent young people with disabilities in the European Union truly enjoy their rights, and whether those rights are fully realised or remain largely declarative—a polished façade of the welfare state with deep cracks beneath the surface.
One answer to these questions can be found in a survey conducted last year by the Youth Committee of the European Disability Forum (EDF). The survey gathered responses from 183 young people with disabilities across all EU member states. Its findings were published in the EDF manifesto on the everyday lives of young people with disabilities, entitled The Right to Shape Our Future.
The survey results should serve as a wake-up call for decision-makers across the European Union. Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with every major aspect of social life. Overall, young people with disabilities said they do not enjoy the right to live in a fair and accessible society. They also reported that their opportunities to shape their own futures and participate in decisions affecting their lives are significantly restricted.
When it comes to influencing society, respondents said that the media either ignore their lives and rights altogether or portray them through stereotypes. Even when useful information is available, it is often presented in formats that remain inaccessible to people with disabilities.
Without young people with disabilities working in media organisations, government ministries and national parliaments, the slogan “Nothing About Us Without Us” risks remaining exactly that—a slogan, a symbolic message carried on banners rather than reflected in public policy and everyday decision-making.
Young respondents were equally critical when asked about accessibility, which the manifesto describes as little more than “a decent proposal” rather than a lived reality.
“People with disabilities face a ‘disability tax’—they pay more for housing, transport and healthcare while navigating a world that was not designed with them in mind. From inaccessible bus stops to cafés that cannot be entered, the built environment continues to undermine independence. True equality requires infrastructure that anticipates diversity rather than treating it as an afterthought,” the manifesto states.
For many young people with disabilities, the right to shape their own future is further limited by segregated education systems that prevent them from reaching their full potential. This, the manifesto argues, contributes to a “poverty trap.”
By the time they complete their education, many are not adequately prepared to compete in the labour market, while the jobs they do obtain often provide only enough income to meet their basic needs.
At the same time, earning an income can result in the loss of essential social support, effectively penalising ambition and trapping many young people with disabilities in poverty, the EDF manifesto concludes.
-
Zdravlje i ljepotaPrije 7 danaNamirnice u borbi protiv gripe
-
Osobe s invaliditetomPrije 3 danaACT Grupa poziva na zapošljavanje osoba s invaliditetom
-
Osobe s invaliditetomPrije 4 danaRoditelji njegovatelji traže pravo na bolovanje i godišnji odmor
-
in MREŽAPrije 5 danaOsobe s invaliditetom u svijetu podcasta
-
VijestiPrije 4 danaU Zagrebu akcija za rano otkrivanje šećerne bolesti
-
VijestiPrije 5 danaDjeca leptiri trebaju dostupnu terapiju
-
EU kutakPrije 6 danaOsobe s invaliditetom u Hrvatskoj među najizloženijima siromaštvu
-
Civilno društvoPrije 6 danaSvatko od nas sutra može postati OSI




